See Editor’s Note Introducing this Feature
On the heels of the Copenhagen climate talks - whose scant accomplishments reveal that climate change science may be no match for international politics - the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) finds itself in a scientific controversy of its own making.
The IPCC Fourth Assessment Report’s malformed paragraph on Himalayan glacier melt has prompted intense, and warranted, criticism of the IPCC review process. This criticism has come not only from climate science skeptics or contrarians. It’s generally clear that the ungrammatical, internally contradictory two sentences - which reproduce errors found in improperly cited sources - shouldn’t have made it into the first draft of the report, much less the final.



