![]() |
| Trees, climate friend or foe? |
It’s fun to be a contrarian, to point out cases in which commonly held conceptions falter, or when the opposite is true.
But contrarian points often require quite a bit of nuance, and seldom do they completely invalidate the common ideas they critique. Also, there is a real danger that in the popularization of contrarian scientific ideas by those without expertise in the field in question, much of the nuance and qualifications gets lost, and readers can be mislead into believing things that do not reflect the actual results or opinions of the researchers whose work is cited.






